Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: 1323-2018    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Evening Public Hearing/Appeal Status: Passed
File created: 3/13/2018 In control: CITY COUNCIL
On agenda: 5/1/2018 Final action: 5/1/2018
Title: Ramona West Annexation, an Annexation of Three Properties Totaling 4.2 Acres at 330 to 336 Silverado Trail
Attachments: 1. ATCH 1 - Resolution, 2. EX A - Location Map
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council

From: Rick Tooker, Community Development Director

Prepared By: Karlo Felix, Senior Planner

Ramona West Annexation, an Annexation of Three Properties Totaling 4.2 Acres at 330 to 336 Silverado Trail


Adopt a resolution requesting that the Local Agency Formation Commission initiate proceedings for the annexation of the three properties at 330 to 336 Silverado Trail; and determining that the actions authorized by this Resolution were adequately analyzed by a previous CEQA action.

The Applicant, Ramona West Family Trust, requests annexation of three parcels at 330, 332, 334, and 336 Silverado Trail (APNs 046-060-002, -006, -007) totaling 4.2 acres. All three of the subject parcels are owned by the Applicant. The parcels have been developed with four single-family homes, one barn, and a vineyard.

The parcels are located within an unincorporated "pocket" substantially surrounded by the City, within the City's Rural Urban Limit (RUL), and the City's Sphere of Influence (SOI). The subject properties are located within the SFI-173, Single-Family Infill General Plan Designation which allows for single-family residences at a density range between four and eight units per acre. The property is located within the RI-5, Single-Family Infill Zoning District which allows for residential development with a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet. No development is proposed as a part of this application. Any future development proposal would be reviewed by the City after the completion of the annexation of the subject properties into the City.

During the review of this application, Staff surveyed one other property owner within the unincorporated pocket to assess their interest in annexation. The property owner expressed opposition to being included in the annexation.

It has been the City's general policy to respect the interests of property owners w...

Click here for full text