Mayor Sedgley called for the applicant's rebuttal.
Greg Pitts of the applicant team provided brief remarks in response to
public comment.
A motion was made by Vice Mayor Luros, seconded by Councilmember
Painter, to close the public hearing. The motion carried unanimously.
Discussion was turned over to Council for deliberation. Individual
comments and questions ensued.
City staff and the applicant team addressed various questions, including
those regarding the approval process, floodway usage, environmental and
noise concerns, site uses, traffic plans, evacuation plans, and fire response
and prevention.
Following the Council discussion, Mayor Sedgley proposed a brief break
for the applicant team to convene and consider potential adjustments to the
project based on suggestions from Council members. These suggestions
included reducing the total number of units, limiting floodway usage,
reducing the number of fire pits, and addressing traffic concerns.
A break was called at 11:36 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 11:45 P.M.
Bernie Corea of the applicant team responded, expressing confidence that
the team could effectively address the right-turn-in and right-turn-out traffic
flow with map service providers. The team would also collaborate with
CalTrans to install some sort of center divider. Regarding density, the team
proposed maintaining a maximum of 80 units at the campsite at any given
time, with a year-round weighted average of 70 units. He noted the
reduction would help limit traffic, particularly on peak days, and reduce the
number of campfires on any given day. Concerning the floodway, the team
would like to keep units there during the non-winter months.
Mayor Sedgley brought discussion back to Council.
A motion was made by Councilmember Narvaez, seconded by Mayor
Sedgley, to, as outlined in the agenda packet, adopt a resolution
adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration, approve the first reading and
introduction of an ordinance, and adopt a resolution approving a Use
Permit and Design Review Permit with modifications to that resolution to
include a change from 100 units to 80 units and an edit to condition #18,
to the reasonable satisfaction of the planning staff to prevent left hand
turns. The motion failed by the following vote:
Aye: 2 - Narvaez and Sedgley
No:
3 - DeNatale, Painter and Luros
Following the vote, the applicant team shared that they would be willing to